As-Is / To-Be
Compare the current and desired states using consistent measures, then separate the observed gap from possible causes and solutions.
Start with your question. Find a suitable framework and see how to use it.
Start at a relevant stage and choose a suitable framework. The order helps you find your place; it is not a required sequence.
Compare the current situation with the desired state and identify the gap.
Possible result: A problem statement and evidence of the gap
Separate the issues and turn a broad concern into a question you can investigate.
Possible result: A structured question and investigation scope
Decide which issue needs attention first under your constraints.
Possible result: Priorities and the reasons for them
Examine external conditions alongside your business's resources and capabilities.
Possible result: Relevant conditions, capabilities, and evidence gaps
Examine customer groups, needs, and experiences using available evidence.
Possible result: Customer insights and questions to check
Compare competitors' offerings, activities, and capabilities.
Possible result: A comparison and possible areas of difference
Explore several possible responses before judging them.
Possible result: A set of candidate ideas
Turn an abstract idea into a proposal people can discuss.
Possible result: A more specific proposal and its assumptions
Compare candidates against explicit constraints and criteria.
Possible result: A choice, tradeoffs, and unresolved checks
Consider business, market, customer, and positioning choices.
Possible result: Candidate directions and the reasons to explore them
Examine what your direction requires and what may prevent it.
Possible result: A possible approach, dependencies, and checks
Describe the intended result and how you will check progress.
Possible result: Goals and measures for reviewing them
Compare what happened with what you intended and identify lessons.
Possible result: Observations, lessons, and next questions
Make activities, responsibilities, and constraints visible.
Possible result: A shared picture of the current work
Consider changes to the work and what each would require.
Possible result: Improvement candidates and validation plans
Make the team's direction and each person's contribution clear.
Possible result: Shared goals and responsibilities
Examine communication and cooperation using specific observations.
Possible result: Issues to discuss and ways to work together
Explore work conditions and goals without assuming what motivates each person.
Possible result: Questions, support options, and follow-up actions
Organize the information so others can understand the point and its basis.
Possible result: A structured explanation or proposal
Compare the current and desired states using consistent measures, then separate the observed gap from possible causes and solutions.
Answer eight planning questions to align the purpose, audience, execution, timing, place, and resource limits of an activity.
Investigate a specific event through successive causal questions, keeping each explanation tied to evidence.
Sort specific issues by what your team can directly change and what depends on someone else's decision, then plan a response for each.
Break a broad question into explicit branches so you can examine its parts and decide what to investigate next.
Connect an observed gap to a bounded improvement task, a target, and explicit constraints before scheduling a solution.
Sort tasks by importance to a stated goal and urgency of their timing, then agree immediate work, scheduled work, delegation, and reductions.
Compare eligible options against shared criteria and make the effects of your weights and ratings visible.
Organize political, economic, social, and technological factors that could affect a defined business decision.
Examine five sources of competitive pressure within a defined industry, recording mechanisms, evidence coverage and unanswered questions.
Examine value, rarity, imitation costs and organizational support for specific resources, preserving uncertainty in each judgment.
Organize internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats to clarify the factors affecting a decision.
Rank categories by one measure and compare their cumulative share before choosing where to focus your investigation.
Compare recency, frequency and monetary value under consistent rules, then plan how to test customer outreach.
Organize a user role, goals, working context, difficulties, and decision criteria while keeping research evidence separate from assumptions.
Organize what one person sees, hears, thinks and feels, says and does, struggles with and hopes for, keeping records distinct from assumptions.
Trace one customer's task through touchpoints, actions and experiences, keeping evidence and unobserved stages visible.
Review product, price, place, and promotion together to make a coherent offer and identify what to test next.
Compare six explicit dimensions: target, value offered, product, price, place and promotion, retaining each claim's evidence status.
Disaggregate a business into linked primary and support activities, then check cost boundaries and possible sources of customer value.
Assess how a combination of skills, relationships, and processes creates customer value, resists imitation, and could support other markets.
Write separately, pass the sheets and build on earlier ideas while retaining each contribution's provenance.
Place a topic in the center of a nine-cell grid and explore eight related directions before choosing ideas to develop.
Separate a problem into dimensions, combine one choice from each, and record why some combinations conflict.
Expand four factor pools and combine one item from each to create concrete, explicitly imagined usage stories.
Use nine prompts to change a product, service, or process, then select variations worth testing.
Describe who an idea serves, the problem it addresses, how it works, and the smallest useful test.
Describe a user’s actions, thoughts, and feedback across key moments to reveal gaps in a proposed experience.
Compare the benefits and drawbacks of possible actions against a shared goal.
Review a message through six lenses: Simple, Unexpected, Concrete, Credible, Emotional, and Stories.
Compare value hypotheses and implementation conditions on separate axes, retaining unknowns and hard-limit failures.
Classify businesses by market growth and relative market share, then examine resource choices and uncertainty.
Separate growth options by existing or new products and markets, then examine their demand and capability assumptions.
Combine evidenced SWOT factors into SO, ST, WO, and WT action candidates, then state their assumptions, resource limits, and validation steps.
Segment customers by meaningful differences, choose a priority group, and describe a position to test against their needs and alternatives.
Display relative positions on two defined dimensions, retaining data nature, sample size, calculation rules and unplaced objects.
Connect customers, value, delivery and economics across nine blocks, then identify the assumptions that need evidence.
Show who provides goods, services, information and money to whom, with explicit directions, assumptions and agreement gaps.
Review Attention, Interest, Desire, Memory, and Action to identify missing information and obstacles before purchase.
Place dated tasks and owners on a timeline, then examine the calendar, dependencies and available person-hours.
Show roles and relationships with an explicit line meaning, keeping project coordination, personnel reporting and decision rights distinct.
Work back from an outcome to stage outputs, enabling resources and explicit decisions, keeping tentative windows distinct from commitments.
Connect an outcome to compatible counts and rates, specify the arithmetic, and keep targets and causal hypotheses separate.
Review acquisition, activation, retention, revenue, and referral with explicit events, cohorts, observation windows, and denominators.
Turn an ambiguous goal into a specific outcome with a measure, a feasibility check, a purpose, and a deadline.
Separate practices to keep, observed problems, and changes to try, then agree how to check the next experiment.
Reflect on what you did, what you learned, and what you will do next, using a specific experience.
Connect a plan, recorded execution, a comparable check and a conditional next action in one review sheet.
List actual tasks, ownership, inputs, outputs, and time on a common basis before choosing a process to improve.
Map a bounded business process with explicit actions, decisions, exceptions and return conditions, separating current records from a proposal.
Build a task network, calculate estimated durations and float, and identify tasks on a critical path.
Assign execution, accountability, consultation and information for each deliverable, then check authority, capacity and actual agreement.
Compare resources and demand by session, then investigate allocation and practice differences before choosing a change.
Examine a process through Eliminate, Combine, Rearrange, and Simplify, starting with whether the work is necessary.
Connect the problem and evidence to a proposed change, expected benefit, resources, implementation, and review.
Clarify why an organization exists, the future it aims for, and the behaviors that guide difficult choices.
Compare stated interests, demonstrated capability and confirmed requirements for the same tasks, preserving gaps and unknowns.
Discuss organizational need and personal willingness separately, then agree priorities, support, and task allocation.
Compare what you and others know about work behavior, then agree a voluntary feedback conversation and a collaboration experiment.
Separate both people’s actions and interpretations, then ask about assumptions before trying a clearer communication practice.
Share what people want and what they can offer, then distinguish possible matches from mutually agreed and completed help.
Examine performance and group maintenance behaviors using observations and team feedback, then choose an improvement.
Identify people who affect or are affected by a change, check influence and interest separately, and plan communication around their actual needs.
Distinguish problems with basic working conditions from opportunities for achievement and growth, then plan and review both kinds of support.
Use stated willingness and demonstrated task skill to discuss support, retaining unknowns and explicit authority boundaries.
Clarify a goal, examine the current reality, explore options, and let the person choose an action and a way to follow up.
Connect a user problem and evidence to a bounded solution, expected value, a validation plan, resource estimates, and the decision required.
Explain an event’s purpose, audience and experience, then make schedule, resources, budget and approval conditions reviewable.
Organize a short recommendation as Point, Reason, Example, Point, and finish with a clear request.
Organize To be, As is, Problem and Solution around the audience’s concern, then make a bounded decision request.
More scenario matches do not mean a better framework. Choose for your specific question.How to use the library